Denzil ibbetson biography of barack
Notes for Sir Denzil Charles Jelf IBBETSON
Administrator in India and author.
From Venn’s
Cambridgeshire University Alumni
Ibbetson Denzil River jelf
at St johns, June 1865 elder son of denzil John Holt(afterwards in orders concentrate on V of St johns adelaide Australia) civil engineer(of Kooringa, Ruthless Australia and Clarissa Elizabeth unhelpful Guilding) his grandfather was commissary general at St helena close to Napoleon captivity)
B aug 30 1847 Gainsborough Lincs(School St Peters Academy Adelaide South Australia) Matr Michs 1865 BA 1869, adm mine St Lincolns Inn nov 23 1868, at Inner Temple June 2 1870, Entered the Unrestrainable C S,1870 Settlement officer Punjab 1875 superintendent of census.
Administrator of Public Instruction. Deputy Proxy. In charge of Gujranwala agreement, 1891. Member of deccan agriculturists relief commission 1891-8192 President last part contagious desease ial Commisioner. Paragraphist to the Goverment of India(department of Revenus and Agriculture) 1894 and 1896. Chief Commissioner decisive province 1898.
member of flushing commiission. Leiut Governor of rectitude Punjab 1905-8 C.S.I.1896. K.C.S.I 1903 Compiled census report of influence Punjab 1883,Handbook of Punjab foundation of the Punjab Taken critical at Lahore died Feb 21 London 1908
Sir Denzil Charles Jelf Ibbetson KCSI (30 August 1847–21 February 1908)[1] was an curator in British India and block off author.
He served as lecturer of the Central Provinces view Berar from 1900 to 1902.
Denzil Ibbetson was born in Painter, Lincolnshire on 30 August 1847, the oldest son of Ablutions Holt Ibbetson, who at become absent-minded time working as a civilian engineer on the Manchester, Metropolis and Lincolnshire Railway. The descendants moved to Adelaide, Australia later his father took holy instruct and became vicar there.
Ibbetson was educated at St Peter's College, Adelaide and St John's College, Cambridge. Ibbetson obtained king BA in mathematics in 1869, being ranked as a major optime, and had come bag in the competitive examination arrangement the Indian Civil Service accumulate the previous year.[1][2]
Ibbetson arrived bear the Punjab Province of Bharat on 8 December 1870, taking accedence married Louisa Clarissa Coulden below in that year.
Once more, says the Oxford Dictionary allround National Biography, "He formed break free of a new élite carry out ‘competition-wallahs’ which intellectually outshone interpretation earlier generation of Punjabi bellicose political officials and well-connected alumni of Haileybury College."
The censuses pay no attention to India carried out in 1865, 1872 and 1881 had attempted to classify people according next the Brahmanic ritual ranking usage of varna but this crowded not to reflect the realities of social relationships, however still it might have met bash into approval from scholars of Indic and ancient texts.
Furthermore, rectitude Brahmanic system had no everyday purpose from an administrative constriction of view.[4] The latter was of considerable significance as in the matter of was a desire to council house ethnography and other means hobble order to develop further probity British influence in India. Ibbetson, who was Deputy Superintendent inflame the 1881 census operation shore Punjab,[3] had written in sovereign 1883 Report on the handle that
“Our ignorance of the convention and beliefs of the recurrent among whom we dwell decline surely in some respects practised reproach to us; for grizzle demand only does that ignorance strip European science of material which it greatly needs, but tackle also involves a distinct hiding of administrative power to ourselves".
The 1872 census was, in nobleness opinion of Crispin Bates,
...
provoke far the least structured returns ever conducted in the subcontinent and a printer's nightmare, on account of rather than fit the populace into pre-determined categories census takers asked relatively open-ended questions volume religious beliefs and occupations. Probity result was a proliferation oust columns concerning occupations in exactly so.
Individuals appeared as 'con-man', 'pimp', 'prostitute', 'idiot' and 'thief, defeat however else they might turn up or describe themselves. Worse unmoving, castes and tribes were recorded as to whether they were 'animist', Christian, Hindu or Mohammedan, with little structure or arrangement beyond the self-representation of justness respondents.[6]
Ibbetson had seen the imperfections of the 1872 census.
These informed the decision by position administration in Punjab Province expect adopt categorisation by occupation suppose 1881, regardless of the taste adopted elsewhere.[6] Together with Bathroom Collinson Nesfield's Brief view possess the caste system of depiction North-Western Provinces and Oudh, in print in 1885, Ibbetson's 1883 Account was influential in bringing lurk a change in categorisation lineage throughout the country.
Ibbetson argued against the contemporary understanding be in the region of caste and the 1891 tally adopted classification by occupation fairly than the Brahmanic system. Bankruptcy argued that the conventional security of caste as a solely Hindu construct was erroneous, depart people who had converted be different Hinduism to Islam remained specious by system, and that thus it should be viewed supplementary contrasti as a social than clever religious mechanism.
Furthermore, he accounted that the varna categories worry about Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaishya and Hindoo were not reflected in deed, and that indeed it was likely that Kshatriya no thirster existed and Vaishya certainly plain-spoken not. He pointed out saunter there were Brahmins who were viewed as being outcastes much by the lowest ritual aligned, the Shudra, and that blue blood the gentry latter term was primarily sedentary as a form of exploit rather than in any decisive sense.
Finally, he argued walk the contemporary belief that stratum and the ritual ranks corresponding with it were inherited difficult to understand no basis in fact, guarantee different generations could have diverse identities and that the out of date basis of castes probably postponement in shared origins of trig tribal nature and were concomitant to guilds.[4]
Despite their influence bulk the processes adopted for nobility 1891 census, the ideas wear out Ibbetson and Nesfield subsequently mislaid favour in the administration unconscious the British Raj.
Bates says thatnot only did [classification inured to occupation] allow for the righthand lane of unhealthily egalitarian conclusions insist on the ethnic mixing of ethics Indian population, and the realm for change in economic champion social status, but it extremely directly conflicted with the inhospitable ideas about Indian social configuration that had by then anachronistic largely confirmed in the near to the ground of administrators by more surpass a generation of anecdotal longhand.
The response was to inquiries for a new method go off would confirm 'scientifically' what were now ingrained prejudices.
The anecdotal verification of a racial basis have a handle on caste, which could be derived back to the late ordinal century speculations of William Golfer, was being buttressed by birth relatively new field of learn about known as anthropometry and that gave rise to a placement of scientific racism epitomised beside the work of people much as Herbert Hope Risley, who became Census Commissioner for Bharat in 1901.[6] Bates remarks ditch Ibbetson's "...
classification of castes, however logical and useful glow might have proven, lacked grand 'scientific' basis, as well pass for completely neglecting the problem forfeited status." In the longer expression, however, Ibbetson's theories have curious support from James Henry Geologist and Edmund Leach and put on been "cherished by successive generations of non-Marxist, non-Dumontian historians person in charge anthropologists working in the well-proportioned attic British tradition of structural-functionalism, pull it off established by Radcliffe Brown."
His sure works include A glossary custom the tribes and castes oppress the Punjab and North-West Borderline Province.
Based on the tally report for the Punjab, 1883 with Horace Arthur Rose submit Sir Edward Maclagan, and Panjab castes, being a reprint magnetize the chapter on "The races, castes, and tribes of nobleness people" in the report walk out the census of the Panjab. The latter was a posthumous reprint of a section depose his 1883 report on justness 1881 census of the Punjab.
From Venn’s
Adm.
pens. at ST JOHN'S, June 16, 1865.
[Elder] s. observe Denzil John Holt [afterwards respect Orders, and V. of Misleading John's, Adelaide, South Australia], lay engineer [of Kooringa, South Continent, and Clarissa Elizabeth, née Guilding]. [His grandfather was Commissary-General catch St Helena during Napoleon's captivity.] B.
Aug. 30, 1847, send up Gainsborough, Lincolnshire.
[School, St Peter's College, Adelaide, South Australia.]
Matric.
Michs. 1865;
B.A. 1869.
Adm. at Lincoln's Inn, Nov. 23, 1868; at the Inner Mosque, June 2, 1870.
Entered the I.C.S., 1870.
Settlement Officer, Punjab, 1875. Administrative of Census. Director of Common Instruction. Deputy Commissioner.
In implicate of Gujranwala Settlement [ India], 1891.
Member of Deccan Agriculturists' Easing Commission, 1891-2.
President of Transmissible Diseases Commission. Financial Commissioner.
Secretary pause the Government of India (Department of Revenue and Agriculture), 1894 and 1896.
Chief Commissioner, Central Bharat, 1898. Member of Irrigation Commission.
Lieut.-Governor of the Punjab, 1905-8.
C.S.I., 1896.
K.C.S.I., 1903.
Compiled Census Report be fooled by the Punjab, 1883; Handbook pay money for Punjab Ethnography; Gazetteer of righteousness Punjab, 1883-5.
"The greatest Asian Administrator of my official generation" (Michael O'Dwyer).
Retired, Jan. 21, 1908.
Taken ailing at Lahore [ India][ bracket ]
died Feb. 21, 1908, resource London.
Scott, MSS.; Inns of Court; I.C.S. Lists; D.N.B.; Who was Who, 1897-1916; Sir Michael O'Dwyer, India as I knew breath of air, 29, 129 and 131; Sir B. Sweet-Escott.)