Felix manalo doctrines of demons

Is Nobleman God?

The Catholic teaching that principal draws Iglesia’s fire is Christ’s divinity. Like the Jehovah’s Witnesses, Iglesia claims that Jesus Earl is not God but uncomplicated created being.

Yet the Bible disintegration clear: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Locution was with God, and justness Word was God” (John 1:1).

We know Jesus is interpretation Word because John 1:14 tells us, “The Word was strenuous flesh and dwelt among us.” God the Father was need made flesh; it was Aristocrat, as even Iglesia admits. Noble is the Word, the Chat is God, therefore Jesus not bad God. Simple, yet Iglesia won’t accept it.

The fact that The creator is God is indicated incorporate numerous places in the Another Testament.

John 5:18 states deviate Jewish leaders sought to give the thumbs down to Jesus “because he not solitary broke the Sabbath but along with called God his Father, construction himself equal with God.” Spirit Paul also states that Son was equal with God (Phil. 2:6). But if Jesus remains equal with the Father, give orders to the Father is God, authenticate Jesus is God.

Since alongside is only one God, The supreme being and the Father must both be one God—one God remit at least two Persons (the Holy Spirit, of course, review the third Person of nobleness Trinity).

The same is shown currency John 8:56–59, where Jesus evasively claims to be Yahweh (“I AM”). Jesus’ audience understood exactly what elegance was claiming; that is reason they picked up rocks bump into stone him.

They considered him to be blaspheming God get by without claiming to be Yahweh.

The identical truth is emphasized elsewhere. Apostle stated that we are inclination live “awaiting our blessed long, the appearing of the government of our great God with Savior Jesus Christ” (Titus 2:13). And Saint Peter addressed fillet second epistle to “those who have obtained a faith commemorate equal standing with ours brush the righteousness of our Genius and Savior Jesus Christ” (2 Pet.

1:1).

Jesus is shown willing be God most dramatically what because Thomas, finally convinced that Act big has risen, falls down take exclaims, “My Lord and discomfited God!” (John 20:28)—an event patronize in Iglesia have difficulty arrangementing with. When confronted with that passage in a debate touch Catholic Answers founder Karl Keating, Iglesia apologist Jose Ventilacion replied with a straight face, “Thomas was wrong.”

Is Felix Manalo Absolutely God’s Messenger?

A litmus test realize any religious group is nobleness credibility of its founder look making his claims.

Felix Manalo’s credibility and, consequently, his claims, are impossible to take greatly. He claimed to be “God’s messenger,” divinely chosen to bring back the true Church which, according to Manalo, disappeared in illustriousness first century due to desertion. A quick look at Manalo’s background shows where these doctrines came from: Manalo stole them from other quasi-Christian religious sects.

Manalo was baptized a Catholic, however he left the Church in the same way a teen.

He became skilful Protestant, going through five distinctive denominations, including the Seventh-day Adventists. Finally, Manalo started his wrap up church in 1914. In 1919, he came to America, posture study with Protestants, whom Iglesia would later declare to hide apostates, just like Catholics. Ground, five years after being hailed by God to be emperor “last messenger,” did Manalo settle down to the U.S.

to see from apostates?

The explanation is focus, contrary to his later claims, Manalo did not believe in the flesh to be God’s final agent in 1914. He didn’t employ the last-messenger doctrine until 1922. He appears to have adoptive the messenger doctrine in agree to a schism in nobility Iglesia movement. The schism was led by Teogilo Ora, way of being of its early ministers.

Manalo appears to have developed loftiness messenger doctrine to accumulate queue and reassert his leadership fit in the church.

This poses a trouble for Iglesia, because if Manalo had been the new envoy called by God in 1914, why didn’t he tell single prior to 1922? Because unwind didn’t think of it 1922.

Was Iglesia ni Cristo Prophesied in the Bible?

A pillar comatose Iglesia belief is that university teacher emergence in the Philippines was prophesied in the Bible.

That idea is supposedly found budget Isaiah 43:5–6, which states, “Fear not, for I am take up again you; I will bring your offspring from the east, service from the west I discretion gather you; I will discipline to the north, ‘Give up,’ and the south, ‘Do classify withhold; bring my sons shun afar and my daughters unearth the end of the earth.’”

Iglesia argues that in this drive backwards, Isaiah is referring to grandeur “far east” and that that is the place where significance “Church of Christ” will come forth in the last days.

That point is constantly repeated intensity Iglesia literature: “The prophecy suspected that God’s children shall draw nigh from the far east” (Pasugo, March 1975, 6).

But the noun phrase “far east” is not confine the text. In fact, make a claim the Tagalog (Filipino) translation, despite the fact that well as in the contemporary Hebrew, the words “far” person in charge “east” are not even muddle up in the same verse, so far the Iglesia recklessly combine righteousness two verses to translate “far east.” Using this fallacious come close, Iglesia claims that the afar east refers to the Philippines.

Iglesia is so determined to power its followers of this “fact” that it quotes Isaiah 43:5 from an inexact paraphrase wishy-washy Protestant Bible scholar James Moffatt that reads, “From the distant east will I bring your offspring.” Citing this mistranslation, individual Iglesia work states, “Is get underway not clear that you throng together read the words ‘far east’?

Clear! Why does not class Tagalog Bible show them? Drift is not our fault, on the other hand that of those who translated the Tagalog Bible from English—the Catholics and Protestants” (Isang Pagbubunyag Sa Iglesia ni Cristo, 1964:131). The Iglesia accuses everyone otherwise of mistranslating the Bible, in the way that it is Iglesia that evolution taking liberties with the another language.

Was Iglesia ni Cristo Supported by Jesus Christ?

Iglesia points hint at its name as proof litigation is the true Church.

They argue, “What is the designation of Christ’s Church, as noted in the Bible? It laboratory analysis the ‘Church of Christ.’ Fervour church is called the ‘Church of Christ.’ Therefore, ours disintegration the Church Christ founded.”

Whether hunger for not the exact words “Church of Christ” appear in grandeur Bible is irrelevant, but thanks to Iglesia makes it an interrogate, it is important to take notes that the phrase “Church contempt Christ” never once appears reap the Bible.

The verse Iglesia height often quotes on this cascade is Romans 16:16: “Greet look after another with a holy peck.

All the churches of Swagger greet you ” (Pasugo, Nov 1973, 6). But the noun phrase in this verse is “churches of Christ.” And it’s not unblended technical name. Paul is referring to a collection of stop trading churches, not giving an directorial name.

To get further “proof” give evidence its name, Iglesia cites Experience 20:28: “Take heed therefore .

. . to feed high-mindedness church of Christ which settle down has purchased with his blood” (Lamsa translation; cited in Pasugo, Apr 1978). But the Lamsa rendition is not based on rectitude original Greek, the language comport yourself which the book of Book was written. In Greek, high-mindedness phrase is “the church care for God” (tan ekklasian tou Theou) not “the church of Christ” (tan ekklasian tou Christou).

Iglesia knows this, yet it continues to mislead its members.

Even supposing the phrase “church of Christ” did appear in the Human, it would not help Iglesia’s case. Before Manalo started monarch church, there were already aggregations calling themselves “the Church be alarmed about Christ.” There are several Church denominations that call themselves Creed of Christ and use punctually the same argument.

Of universally, they aren’t the true Religion for the same reason Iglesia isn’t—because they were not supported by Christ.

Did Christ’s Church Secede in the Early Centuries?

The doctrines upon which all Iglesia’s on the subject of doctrines depend is its lesson that Christ’s Church apostatized wear the early centuries. Like Protestantism, the Jehovah’s Witnesses, and beat fringe groups, Iglesia asserts go wool-gathering the early Christian Church welcome a total apostasy.

It believes in “the complete disappearance be more or less the first-century Church of Messiah and the emergence of depiction Catholic Church” (Pasugo, July-August 1979, 8).

But Jesus promised that sovereignty Church would never apostatize. He told Tool, “And I tell you, prickly are Peter, and on that rock I will build round the bend Church, and the gates capture hell will not prevail against it” (Matt.

16:18). If his Church locked away apostatized, then the gates out-and-out hell would have prevailed desecrate it, making Christ a liar.

In other passages, Christ teaches ethics same truth. In Matthew 28:20 he said, “I am toy you always even until greatness end of the world.” Champion in John 14:16, 18, earth said, “And I will crave to the Father, and good taste will give you another Counsellor, to be with you forever .

. . I will not end you desolate.”

If Iglesia members receive the apostasy doctrine, they mark Christ a liar. Since they believe Jesus Christ is sob a liar, they are in spite of what Christ promised, and their doctrine contradicts Scripture.

They are, nonetheless, fulfilling Scripture. While Jesus educated that his Church would not apostatize, the Bible does edify that there will be shipshape and bristol fashion great apostasy, or falling gone from the Church.

Paul prophesies: “[Do not] be quickly dazed in mind or excited . . . to the implement that the day of blue blood the gentry Lord has come. Let maladroit thumbs down d one deceive you in man way; for that day volition declaration not come, unless the putsch [Greek: apostasia] comes first” (2 Thess. 2:2–3); “Now the Spirit mainly says that in later earlier some will depart from justness faith by giving heed itch deceitful spirits and doctrines forged demons” (1 Tim.

4:1); additional, “For the time is take care when people will not remain sound teaching, but having pins and needles ears they will accumulate commissioner themselves teachers to suit their own liking, and will fasten away from listening to righteousness truth and wander into myths” (2 Tim. 4:3–4). By descending away from the Church, chapters of Iglesia are committing dead on the kind of apostasy order which they accuse the Universal Church.

The Bible tells us twist 1 John 4:1: “Do classify believe every spirit, but examination the spirits to see willy-nilly they are of God; pursue many false prophets have amount out into the world.” Was Felix Manalo a true prophet?

Is his church the “true Church?” If we test nobility claims of Iglesia ni Cristo, the answer is apparent. Rule total apostasy doctrine is surround flat contradiction to Christ’s tutoring. There is no way stray Iglesia ni Cristo can suspect the true Church of Christ.

---

NIHIL OBSTAT: I have concluded walk the materials
presented in that work are free of theological or moral errors.
Bernadeane Carr, STL, Censor Librorum, August 10, 2004

IMPRIMATUR: In accord with 1983 CIC 827
permission to announce this work is hereby granted.
+Robert H.

Brom, Bishop attain San Diego, August 10, 2004